The Herald reported this month that the City of Newcastle had called for expressions of interest (EOI) for the redevelopment of Newcastle and Merewether ocean baths in return for long-term leases.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
This EOI process has come as surprise to the community, and independent councillors. This raises the question of how the council is meeting its policy of open and transparent governance.
The council adopted a community engagement policy in November 2018, including the principles of accountability, inclusiveness, transparency, commitment and responsiveness.
The policy references the council's 2030 strategic plan, in particular that council "will provide opportunities for genuine engagement with the community to inform council's decision making". What does this mean for the two iconic ocean baths and how did we do?
In developing or enhancing community infrastructure a well-considered community engagement process is the first step.
In developing or enhancing community infrastructure a well-considered community engagement process is the first step.
According to the International Association of Public Participation (IAP2) process, the council should have identified the most appropriate method of engagement. This can range from informing the community about a project, consulting, collaborating, all the way to empowering them to participate in the decision-making.
City of Newcastle references IAP2 in its policy and "abides by best practice principles developed by the IAP2. Council also acknowledges that the IAP2 model of public participation is values based, decision-oriented and goal driven."
IAP2 advocates that organisations assess impacts on communities and identifies the best way to engage with them. The crucial time for high impact community engagement is at the beginning of a project idea, such as the concept or design stage. By any measure, City of Newcastle has not assessed the significant community interest in the ocean baths and undertaken engagement before an EOI process.
Questions that should have been asked before the EOI phase include; What is the likely impact of any changes to the baths? What is the level of community interest? Who will be affected? How many users do we have and who are they? How can we engage the community in a discussion about changes at the baths? What are the most appropriate methods of engagement?
The council did not do that, and now strong community interest in the project has been demonstrated in the online petition against the perceived privatisation of the baths and changes to community use.
Best practice community engagement would have allowed the council to have a meaningful conversation with the community before an EOI process, enabling community involvement in determining the best balance of public and private use, recognition of the key attributes that are important to the community and worth preserving, and gaining insight and ideas from the community about future plans.
This would have had the added benefit of bringing the council and community closer, generating a spirit of goodwill, and would probably result in a better outcome with community support.
The community could be forgiven for thinking that any changes to the baths would be sympathetic to its heritage and community values, as the Labor councillors promised to refurbish the baths using council funds before the last council election.
Lord mayor Nuatali Nelmes said then; "we will deliver $3million required to deliver much needed upgrades to public facilities and clear the way for future investment in the southern pavilion for place activation and small scale facilities like a cafe or restaurant".
What we see now is a far cry from the original promise. Under the scope provided to developers, the historic open-air change rooms at Newcastle will be demolished and replaced by a much smaller and less functional indoor facility.
This represents just 2.5 per cent of the 5800 square metres being offered to the developer.
This is a fundamental change that ignores the heritage of the ocean baths precinct.
It's time we practise what we preach, and work with our community in constructive and positive ways.
The council should defer the EOI process and undertake a comprehensive engagement process with the community.
This would allow people who are most impacted to be heard and to contribute, and for the council to harness the collective wisdom, knowledge and ideas from our most valuable asset, our citizens.
Independent councillor Kath Elliott is a community engagement specialist and regular swimmer at the Merewether ocean baths.
While you're with us, did you know the Newcastle Herald offers breaking news alerts, daily email newsletters and more? Keep up to date with all the local news - sign up here.
IN THE NEWS
- Police appeal over 'deliberately lit' Morisset bushfires
- Greta residents on edge as fire flares up for second time in 24 hours
- How to help NSW and Queensland bushfire victims and firefighters: where to donate money, clothes and groceries and how to offer accommodation
- Malcolm Roberts accuses BHP, Chandler Macleod and CFMMEU of 'collusion' over Mount Arthur
- Daniel Saifiti: Why I want to feel nervous again
- Letters to the editor and short takes, November 13 2019